![]() ![]() Correlation can offer insight, but without running controlled experiments, it doesn’t prove causation. Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: In other words, one action following another does not mean there is a causal link. It’s used all the time in lazy filmmaking to mislead the audience, and it’s often found in an argument to distract one from making a good decision. Red Herring: A red herring is something irrelevant that is raised to deflect attention. That means a retreat from innovation, which is bad business. Often an adherence to tradition means a reluctance to try new things. ![]() ![]() Only, things change, and if you’re not flexible you’re going to end up broken. But even in such cases it never hurts to run their argument through the ringer to make sure everything makes sense before you agree.Īppeal to Tradition: This, like all logical fallacies, is when we get lazy and turn off our minds. Plus, being innovative requires taking risks and being aggressive.Īrgument from Authority: It’s important to only trust a person in authority if they’ve earned that trust because they’re knowledgeable, experienced and skilled. It means we do the research and learn before making a decision. But that doesn’t mean we throw up our hands and give up. It’s okay not to like somebody but give their argument its due.Īppeal to Ignorance: Appealing to ignorance is used more often than you’d think. If this person is arguing, say, why a project must be aware of a certain risk, and you dismiss them because they’re always complaining, you’re making a logical fallacy. There are going to be team members who you personally don’t connect with, even though they excel at their job. Reporting tools and surveys can help you collect the necessary data to avoid hasty generalizations.Īd Hominem: When the listener attacks the person who is advancing the argument and ignores what they’re actually saying. Don’t decide until you have a deep, rich pool of information. It’s making a decision without all the facts having first been gathered and understood in context of the decision you’re making. Hasty Generalization: In short, a hasty generalization is when you neglect to perform your due diligence. How can logical fallacies harm your decision-making process? In myriad ways, but for the sake of brevity we’ll examine seven examples of logical fallacies that should be avoided. A logical fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric that contains a fatal flaw which undermines its soundness, thereby leading to an erroneous, and potentially damaging, conclusion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |